|
Idiot America: How Stupidity Became a Virtue in the Land of the Free |  | Author: Charles P. Pierce Publisher: Doubleday Category: Book
List Price: $26.00 Buy Used: $8.27 as of 7/31/2010 20:26 CDT details You Save: $17.73 (68%)
New (41) Used (26) from $8.27
Seller: seattlegoodwill Rating: 131 reviews Sales Rank: 144797
Media: Hardcover Pages: 304 Number Of Items: 1 Shipping Weight (lbs): 1 Dimensions (in): 8.3 x 5.7 x 1.3
ISBN: 0767926145 Dewey Decimal Number: 973.93 EAN: 9780767926140 ASIN: 0767926145
Publication Date: June 2, 2009 Availability: Usually ships in 1-2 business days
| |
| Also Available In:
|
| Similar Items:
| |
| Editorial Reviews:
Amazon.com Review Book Description The Culture Wars Are Over and the Idiots Have Won. A veteran journalist's acidically funny, righteously angry lament about the glorification of ignorance in the United States. In the midst of a career-long quest to separate the smart from the pap, Charles Pierce had a defining moment at the Creation Museum in Kentucky, where he observed a dinosaur. Wearing a saddle... But worse than this was when the proprietor exclaimed to a cheering crowd, âWe are taking the dinosaurs back from the evolutionists!â He knew then and there it was time to try and salvage the Land of the Enlightened, buried somewhere in this new Home of the Uninformed. With his razor-sharp wit and erudite reasoning, Pierce delivers a gut-wrenching, side-splitting lament about the glorification of ignorance in the United States, and how a country founded on intellectual curiosity has somehow deteriorated into a nation of simpletons more apt to vote for an American Idol contestant than a presidential candidate. With Idiot America, Pierce's thunderous denunciation is also a secret call to action, as he hopes that somehow, being intelligent will stop being a stigma, and that pinheads will once again be pitied, not celebrated. A Q&A with Charles P. Pierce
Question: What inspired, or should I say drove, you to write Idiot America? Charles P. Pierce: The germ of the idea came as I watched the extended coverage of the death of Terri Schiavo. I wondered how so many people could ally themselves with so much foolishness despite the fact that it was doing them no perceptible good, politically or otherwise. And it looked like the national media simply could not help itself but be swept along. This started me thinking and, when I read a clip in the New York Times about the Creation Museum, I pitched an idea to Mark Warren, my editor at Esquire, that said simply, âDinosaurs with saddles.â What we determined the theme of the eventual pieceâand of the bookâwould be was âThe Consequences Of Believing Nonsense.â Question: You visited the Creation Museum while writing Idiot America. Describe your experience there. What was your first thought when you saw a dinosaur with a saddle on its back? Charles P. Pierce: My first thought was that it was hilarious. My second thought was that I was the only person in the place who thought it was, which made me both angry and a little melancholy. Outside of the fact that its âscienceâ is a god-awful parodic stew of paleontology, geology, and epistemology, all of them wholly detached from the actual intellectual method of each of them. The most disappointing thing is that the completed museum is so dreadfully grim and earnest and boring. It even makes dragon myths servant to its fringe biblical interpretations. Who wants to live in a world where dragons are boring? Question: Is there a specific turning point where, as a country, we moved away from prizing experience to trusting the gut over intellect? Charles P. Pierce: I don't know if there's one point that you can point to and say, âThis is when it happened.â The conflict between intellectual expertise and reflexive emotionâoften characterized as âgood old common sense,â when it is neither common nor senseâhas been endemic to American culture and politics since the beginning. I do think that my profession, journalism, went off the tracks when it accepted as axiomatic the notion that âPerception is reality.â No. Perception is perception and reality is reality, and if the former doesn't conform to the latter, then itâs the journalist's job to hammer and hammer the reality until the perception conforms to it. That's how âintelligent designâ gets treated as âscienceâ simply because a lot of people believe in it. Question: You delve into Ignatius Donnellyâs life story. In 1880, he published the book Atlantis: The Antediluvian World in an attempt to prove that the lost city existed. Yet, you characterize Donnelly as a lovable crank, and donât take issue with him as you do with modern eccentrics, like Rush Limbaugh. Whatâs the difference between a harmless crank and a crank in Idiot America? Charles P. Pierce: Cranks are noble because cranks are independent. Cranks do not care if their ideas succeedâthey'd like them to do soâbut cranks stand apart. Their value comes when, occasionally, their lonely dissents from the commonplace affect the culture, at which point either the culture moves to adopt them and their ideas come to influence the culture. The American crank is not someone with 600 radio stations spewing bilious canards to an audience of âdittoheads.â The concept of a âdittoheadâ is anathema to the American crank. He is a freethinker addressing an audience of them, whether that audience is made up of one person or a thousand. A charlatan is a crank who sells out. Question: What is the most dangerous aspect of Idiot America? Charles P. Pierce: The most dangerous aspect of Idiot America is that it encourages us to abandon our birthright to be informed citizens of a self-governing republic. America cannot function on automatic pilot, and, too often, we don't notice that it has been until the damage has already been done. Question: Is there a voice or leader of Idiot America? Charles P. Pierce: The leaders of Idiot America are those people who abandoned their obligations to the above. There are lots of people making an awful lot of money selling their ideas and their wares to Idiot America. Idiot America is an act of collective will, a product of lassitude and sloth. Question: What is the difference between stupidity and glorifying ignorance? Charles P. Pierce: Stupidity is as stupidity does, to quote a uniquely stupid movie. It has been with us always and always will be. But we moved into an era in which stupidity was celebrated if it managed to sell itself well, if it succeeded, if it made people money. That is âglorifying ignorance.â We moved into an era in which the reflexive instincts of the Gut were celebrated at the expense of reasoned, informed opinion. To this day, we have a political partyâthe Republicansâwho, because it embraced a âmovement of Conservatismâ that celebrated anti-intellectualism is now incapable of conducting itself in any other way. That has profound political and cultural consequences, and the truly foul part about it was that so many people engaged in it knowing full well they were peddling poison. Question: While writing Idiot America, what story or incident made you the most incensed? Charles P. Pierce: Without question, it was talking to the people at Woodside Hospice, who shared with me what it was like to be inside the whirlwind stirred up by people who used the prolonged death of Terri Schiavo as a political and social volleyball to advance their own unpopular and reckless agenda. There are peopleâSean Hannity comes to mindâwho, if there is a just god in heaven, should be locked in a room for 20 minutes with Annie Santa Maria, the indomitable woman who works with the patients at the hospice. Only one of them would come out, and it wouldn't be him. Question: With the election of President Obama, is Idiot America coming to an end? Or, will there always be a place for idiocy in America? Charles P. Pierce: Look at the political opposition to President Obama. âSocialist!â âFascist!â âComing to get your guns.â Hysteria from the hucksters of Idiot America is still at high-tide. People are killing other people and specifically attributing their action to imaginary oppression stoked by radio talk-show stars and television pundits. That Glenn Beck has achieved the prominence he has makes me wonder if there is a just god in heaven. Question: Are there any positive signs that we are moving away from Idiot America? If you could create a twelve step program to America back on track, what would be your first suggestion? Charles P. Pierce: Remember that perception is not reality, that opinion, no matter how widely held, is not fact. An old and wise friend of mine said that the only question that any American citizen is required to answer is âDo you govern or are you governed?â It has to be answered in the former, and that answer has to be continuous. We have to get back to that. (Photo © Brendan Doris Pierce, 2008)
Product Description NATIONAL BESTSELLER
The three Great Premises of Idiot America: · Any theory is valid if it sells books, soaks up ratings, or otherwise moves units · Anything can be true if someone says it loudly enough · Fact is that which enough people believe. Truth is determined by how fervently they believe it With his trademark wit and insight, veteran journalist Charles Pierce delivers a gut-wrenching, side-splitting lament about the glorification of ignorance in the United States. Pierce asks how a country founded on intellectual curiosity has somehow deteriorated into a nation of simpletons more apt to vote for an American Idol contestant than a presidential candidate. But his thunderous denunciation is also a secret call to action, as he hopes that somehow, being intelligent will stop being a stigma, and that pinheads will once again be pitied, not celebrated. Erudite and razor-sharp, Idiot America is at once an invigorating history lesson, a cutting cultural critique, and a bullish appeal to our smarter selves.
|
| Customer Reviews:
Showing reviews 1-5 of 131
Towards an end to the Age of Disinformation July 17, 2010 Malvin (Frederick, MD USA) 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
"Idiot America" by Charles P. Pierce is a righteous screed against the commercialized stupidity that has taken over American discourse. Written with a blend of acerbic wit and intelligence, Mr. Pierce's book rallies thinking people to the task of standing up against those who wish to undo the Enlightenment values upon which our democracy depends.
In a land dedicated to free thinking, Mr. Pierce contends that the American 'crank' deserves the space to spew outrageous yarns about Atlantis or the Templars for consumption by the gullible. However, Mr. Pierce makes it clear that recently the marketplace of ideas has been corrupted by corporate power, empowering the cranks of yesteryear to become the charlatans of today (see also Common Nonsense: Glenn Beck and the Triumph of Ignorance). Disinformation and propaganda have become dominant, legitimated by their broadcast from what many people inexplicably consider to be reputable sources such as the FOX News network.
Framing each section of the book with wisdom gleaned from the writings of James Madison, Mr. Pierce shows us how far we have gone astray. The author tackles many of the high-profile controversies of the disinformation age, including the Dover textbook trial, the Terri Schiavo case, the molding of public opinion to support war against Iraq and subsequent torture policies, and much more. As gut instincts overrule our intellect, the result is an increasingly dysfunctional America characterized by ideology, superstition and incivility.
I highly recommend this book to everyone.
Wished for something else. July 16, 2010 Ken Libbey (Decatur GA) 3 out of 3 found this review helpful
I certainly agree with the author's contempt for the anti-science and anti-intellectualism of the American conservative movement.
I could have done without the space devoted to the nineteenth century author of Atlantis. Mostly, though, I was hoping for an analysis of the dumbing-down of American culture, and it never came. How did it happen that our movies and television programs came to be written for juveniles? Why is the news media populated by people who seem never to have studied history? How did athletic entertainment become the primary mission of higher education? Why was authentic country music replaced by radio pablum? These questions would make a good book.
Absolutely Hilarious July 16, 2010 Olga Bezhanova (Edwardsville, IL) 2 out of 2 found this review helpful
What a great book, people! I laughed so hard my stomach muscles hurt and I don't even have any stomach muscles. The book is well-structured, beautifully written, and the author's sense of humor is unique in its power to make you roar with laughter almost against your will. This is a book in which you don't know what parts to highlight because you want to highlight the entire thing.
Pierce sets out to answer the question that has been bothering me for years now: how did it happen that in America, the country where education and knowledge were traditionally venerated, the country built on the Enlightened principles of reason, the country of immigrants who killed themselves working in order to give an education to their children, a cult of stupidity and the hatred of education, knowledge and expertise suddenly became so prominent. There were always so many people in America, Pierce says, who were total cranks, who floated around the craziest, weirdest, silliest ideas. This has been a safe haven for a religious fanatic of every ilk, for the crazy inventor, for a political visionary of insane visions. Or, as Pierce puts it: "This is still the best country ever in which to peddle complete public lunacy." And it's a great thing. When people can freely generate and circulate even the most insane ideas, society is enriched. There is debate, there is intellectual curiosity, there is passion. Even if some of these ideas are completely nutty, they can still be productive because they can provoke intelligent responses from those who debunk them. The scary things start happening, however, when this nuttiness - which can be fruitful and endearing when relegated to the margins - becomes mainstream, when it becomes the only thing on offer in politics, culture, and entertainment.
When this happens, bashing science becomes a pastime of choice for the public. Theories are widely circulated "about how liberals - or liberal fascists - use science to discredit traditional religion, as though, somewhere in a laboratory, physicists are studying the faintest echoes of the big bang and thinking, at first, not of the Nobel Prize and the nifty trip to Stockholm, but, rather, 'Bite me, Jehovah!'" The Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia quotes the fictional character of the TV series 24 as precedent in support for torture. Intelligent Design is presented as a valid alternative to evolution. Science is relegated to the status of mere opinion.
Since we have no use for knowledge and expertise, we don't expect it from our leaders. A politician is supposed to be able to respond with memorable, snappy soundbites to questions that have come to represent the most divisive issues. Nobody cares about what the politician can actually do for us, but everybody is eagerly awaiting for the right response to the next stupid question. One of the example that Pierce gives is the conversation between Pastor Rick Warren and the presidential candidate Barack Obama: "Warren . . . asked, 'At what point does a baby get human rights?' The only proper answer to this question for anyone running for president is 'How the hell do I know? If that's what you want in a president, vote for Thomas Aquinas.' Instead, Obama summoned up some faith-based flummery that convinced few people in a crowd that, anyway, had no more intention of voting for him than erecting a statue of Baal in the parking lot." In a presidential election where people cared less about the candidate's qualifications to fix the ailing economy than about his poor bowling skills, this was just one episode of insanity among many.
Whenever a politician tries to talk about things that really matter in an informed, intelligent way, s/he immediately loses ground to the opponent who can entertain the public so much better and avoid the boring recitation of facts. In a debate between the Republican presidential candidates, the question of torture was raised: "Speaking from his experience, which was both unique and not inconsiderable, John McCain argued that, in addition to being basically immoral, torture doesn't work. He was quickly shouted down by Giuliani, who was once tortured by the thought that his second wife wouldn't move out of the mayor's mansion in favor of his current girlfriend, and by Romney, who once was tortured by the fact that gay people in Massachusetts were allowed to marry each other." (I told you he was hilarious, and I'm not even quoting the best parts.)
When you elect a politician who seems like a nice guy or a great gal, you end up in a needless unwinnable war, with a messed up economy, and with a lot of confusion about what just happened to bring us all to this place.
Very good read July 9, 2010 Julian Paulson 1 out of 1 found this review helpful
I first became intersted in this book after listening to a recent interview on NPR. One of the things that stuck out before I purchased was the ratings on amazon. mostly 5's or 1's, and if your read the comments they are obviously politically influenced. It is no surprise that someone who is conservative might not like this book, and it even goes as far as people rating the book 1 without reading it. I personally loved this book, although at timse the writing style took a little of "trudging" to get through. Would recommend this book for sure.
Anti-intellectualism at its finest July 6, 2010 Karl W. Randolph 2 out of 49 found this review helpful
Like Elliot Katz, I haven't read the book either, but that interview ... well, if it is anything like the book, then is the book worth reading? The internal contradictions of the author are so sweeping that it left me amazed at the audacity of inconsistency.
He decries the descent into intellectual denial by the movement to trust one's feelings rather than critical thought, yet it has been the left, in academia as well as popular media, who have pushed the "feel, don't think" mantra (Luke Skywalker in Starwars, anyone? Lion King? Elasti-girl in The Incredibles? Etc.?). "How do you feel about that?" is more important than "What do you think about that?" His description of his visit to the Creationist Museum is a display of his biases without critical thought to back them up.
His description of the killing of Terry Schiavo (she was killed just as assuredly as if she had been shot, or put in a gas chamber) shows intellectual laziness that he has not come to grips with the intellectual understanding that this was state sponsored murder, no different than what the Nazis did. It would have been more humane that if she were to be killed, to have done so by one of the above methods, or a lethal injection, than by the slow suffering of hunger and thirst that was used. But they couldn't do that, because the parallels would have been too obvious. That Mr. Pierce has not bothered to understand the logical premises on which people have come to the conclusion that this was state sponsored murder, shows that he is a perfect example of that which he decries.
The interview exudes the smug superiority complex that if one believes as the author, then he is an intellectual: if he disagrees, then he is an unthinking idiot. That is anti-intellectualism at its finest. That interview is a good argument not to read the book, an argument backed up in spades by many of the reviews. But unlike the reviews, those are the author's own words considering the subject of the book, which make them a better argument not to waste my time reading the book.
Showing reviews 1-5 of 131
|
|
|
CERTAIN CONTENT THAT APPEARS ON THIS SITE COMES FROM AMAZON SERVICES LLC. THIS CONTENT IS PROVIDED ‘AS IS’ AND IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE OR REMOVAL AT ANY TIME. Disclaimer: The products referenced on this site are manufactured and sold by other parties and sold through Amazon.com We make no representations regarding either the products or any information vendors offer about their products. Any questions, complaints, or claims regarding the products must be directed to the appropriate manufacturer or vendor, or to Amazon.com. | |